Skip to main content
    Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to footer
    Artificial Intelligence

    Model Governance

    Also known as:
    ML Governance
    Model Management
    Model Risk Management
    MLOps Governance
    Updated: 2/9/2026

    Processes and controls for the entire lifecycle of ML models: Development, validation, deployment, monitoring, and retirement.

    Quick Summary

    Model Governance controls ML lifecycle: Development → Approval → Deployment → Monitoring → Retirement. Model registry and approval workflows are core.

    Explanation

    Model governance includes: Model registry (version control), approval workflows, model cards, performance monitoring, drift detection, retraining policies, retirement criteria. Financial sector leading (SR 11-7).

    Marketing Relevance

    Every production ML needs governance: Which model is running? Who approved it? When will it be retired? Without governance: Chaos and risk.

    Example

    A model registry stores all versions of the churn prediction model with metadata: Who trained, what data, what performance, who approved for production.

    Common Pitfalls

    Governance too bureaucratic: Slows innovation. Governance too lax: Uncontrolled risk. Find balance.

    Origin & History

    Model risk management comes from finance (Fed SR 11-7, 2011). Spread with ML adoption. MLOps platforms (MLflow, Weights & Biases) integrate governance features.

    Comparisons & Differences

    Model Governance vs. AI Governance

    AI Governance is strategic (policies, ethics); Model Governance is operational (registry, workflows, monitoring).

    Model Governance vs. MLOps

    MLOps is the technical practice; Model Governance is the control framework above it.

    Related Services

    Related Terms

    👋Questions? Chat with us!